Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves landfill feasibility study, actuarial study for first responders and other measures; marketing contract fails
Summary
At the Jan. 7 Jackson City Council meeting, members approved a landfill transfer-station feasibility study, an actuarial study for hazardous-duty supplemental retirement benefits, accepted streets in a new subdivision and voted down a proposed marketing contract. Several smaller budget and grant amendments also passed.
Jackson City Council on Jan. 7 approved several smaller but substantive items that will shape city services and planning, including a transfer-station feasibility study for solid waste, an actuarial study tied to state changes in first-responder retirement benefits, and the acceptance of streets in a new subdivision. A proposed contract for citywide marketing services failed in council vote.
The council awarded a contract to Gershman, Brittner & Bratton, Inc. (GBB) to conduct a landfill transfer-station feasibility study, not to exceed $50,000. Staff said the study will assess feasibility, financial impacts and potential operating models and provide recommendations ahead of the expiration of the city's current solid-waste contract in late February. The motion to select GBB passed with a recorded tally of 8 yes and 1 abstention.
The council also approved a resolution authorizing an actuarial study to evaluate the cost and feasibility of providing a supplemental hazardous-duties retirement benefit for first responders after recent state changes to the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System. The item passed unanimously. The study is an early, low-cost step (staff said under $500) to learn potential long-term costs before the city considers benefit changes.
A proposed contract with Perris Creative Agency LLC for marketing services (one-year term with up to four city renewal options) failed on the council floor after questions about scope, rates and whether the city had evaluated other vendors. Staff and council members discussed that departments already had advertising budgets to use if outside services were needed; Perris's proposal included hourly and project rates. The motion failed; the council did not approve the contract at this meeting.
Other council actions
- Street acceptance for Windstone Section 6B (tally recorded 8 yes, 1 abstain) — staff will record accepted streets and add them to the city's maintenance inventory.
- Resolution to apply for a state grant to purchase equipment for the AMP venue — approved (tally recorded 8 yes, 1 no). The packet lists the local match amount.
- Contracting/payment questions raised: council asked staff to provide detail on a recent $744,000 payment line and to clarify an attorney-retainer vs. outside-counsel billing item that appeared in the city's payments.
Why it matters
The landfill transfer-station feasibility study is timed to inform a contract renewal decision and could influence long-term collection, recycling and disposal choices. The actuarial study on hazardous-duty benefits follows a state-level change and is an early step that will allow the city to weigh options with an actuarial cost estimate before policy decisions. The failed marketing contract means the city will either reconsider procurement, rely on in-house communications or pursue other vendors.
What happens next
Staff will execute the landfill feasibility contract and begin that study; the actuarial report for hazardous-duty benefits will be returned to council when complete. Council requested additional detail from staff on invoices and attorney billing to clarify recent payments.
Ending
Council members emphasized the need for documentation and adherence to procedure for high-profile projects, and several members asked that future items include fuller backup materials so the council and public can review proposed contracts and capital projects before votes.
