Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planned Open Space Amendment Article 8.1 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Poquoson commission initiates review of planned open-space conservation rules

2109419 · January 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Poquoson Coastal Planning Commission voted to initiate a review and amendment of Article 8.1 (Planned Open Space Conservation Veil District) after staff identified gaps in minimum lot size and open-space requirements and concerns about wetlands counting toward usable open space.

At its Dec. 2, 2024 meeting the Poquoson Coastal Planning Commission voted to initiate a review and amendment of Article 8.1 (Planned Open Space Conservation Veil District) to address minimum lot sizes, open-space calculations and potential architectural controls.

Planning staff explained the request, saying recent applications have relied on wetlands to meet open-space requirements even though those areas are not usable for passive or active recreation. Staff said the revisions would aim to ensure open space is usable and to consider uniform architectural standards to avoid inconsistent appearances in new subdivisions. Staff said a complete draft would be provided to the commission in time for a future public hearing, likely on Jan. 23, 2025.

A motion to initiate the review was made, seconded and carried. Commissioners voting in favor were recorded; the chair announced that the motion carried and staff will present a draft amendment and accompanying public hearing at a future meeting. The commission did not adopt any ordinance language Dec. 2; the action was limited to initiating the review process.

Commissioners and staff emphasized the rationale: wetlands, while qualifying as open space under current language, often do not provide the intended recreational or conservation value and the city may need clearer minimum lot-size rules and architectural controls to maintain the character of planned subdivisions. Staff also said they would bring a complete draft to the commission and schedule the required public hearing once the text is finalized.

No funding decisions or specific regulatory text were adopted at the meeting; the initiation directs staff to prepare draft ordinance language for subsequent public review and hearing.