Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts Data Privacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves remaining contracts including special-education monitoring agreements with external reviewers

2108612 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved remaining pulled contracts, including agreements that allow contracted reviewers to access special-education files for monitoring; staff clarified the contracts provide access for review rather than data export.

The Utah State Board of Education voted to approve the remaining contracts pulled from the consent calendar, including multiple contracts for special-education monitoring that allow contracted reviewers to view student records during monitoring reviews.

Katie Chalice, director of privacy, explained the monitoring contracts are for individuals who will review special-education folders and files to verify compliance as part of federal monitoring activities. Chalice said, "They're reviewing special ed folders or files, for example, to ensure that everything is accurate. So they're assisting in that monitoring process. As a result of that, they will view the information that's in said files. It's not an export type of situation. We're not giving them the data, but they will have access to it by reviewing the files."

Board members asked whether the contracts should describe the distinction between "viewing" and "sharing." Chalice said the current form uses "shared" broadly to mean viewed or accessed and that staff have discussed adding separate language to differentiate accessed/viewed data from exported/shared data. A board member asked staff to add a separate line on the form to make the distinction clearer; Chalice said she would work with contracts and purchasing on that change.

Members also discussed the degree of federal monitoring required and the number of contracted reviewers used in prior monitoring work; one board member noted a recent monitoring event used 28 individuals, including 6 contractors. The motion to approve the remaining contracts passed with a recorded tally of 12 in favor and 2 opposed (names for the opposing votes were recorded in the meeting as Member Green and one other member not specified in the transcript excerpt). Staff emphasized that the contracts provide on-site review access and do not involve exporting files offsite as a data-transfer process.