This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Several residents used the public‑comment period at the MSAD 52 board meeting to voice concerns about the Maine Integrated Youth Health Survey and to ask the district to treat participation as opt‑in rather than opt‑out for middle‑school students.
An unnamed parent spoke early in public comment to express worry over a student survey that included questions about sexual topics and drug use asked of fifth‑ and sixth‑grade students; the parent said they did not believe such questions are appropriate for that age and worried parents might not know their child received the survey. The speaker said: “I don't think the school is the right environment for other people's kids to bring that stuff up” and asked whether the survey content follows district policy.
Allen Sarvinas, identified as director and organizer for Parents’ Rights in Education Maine, urged the board to consider an opt‑in policy for the Maine Integrated Youth Health Survey. Sarvinas said his group finds the survey’s wording troubling: he reported that the 2025 instrument used the words "gender" seven times and a sexual term 16 times (transcript used partial redaction). He recommended the district hold a separate presentation by an organization independent of the Maine Health and Human Services funding sources so parents could review question content before the survey is administered.
Board members did not take immediate action during the meeting but the public comments placed the issue on record and were forwarded to staff for follow‑up.
Why it matters: questions about student health surveys raise privacy and parental‑consent considerations. The district’s public comment record will inform any staff recommendations on whether to change the survey distribution model and whether to provide additional parent briefings.
Next steps: staff to track the public comments and, if appropriate, provide the board with options for survey administration (opt‑in vs opt‑out) and possible third‑party review of the survey questions.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,137 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit