Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

York County Council: votes at a glance — chair, consent agenda and eight rezoning first readings

January 11, 2025 | York County, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

York County Council: votes at a glance — chair, consent agenda and eight rezoning first readings
At its Jan. 6, 2025, meeting York County Council completed organizational votes and a series of first-reading rezoning actions. Below is a concise rundown of formal motions and tally results recorded during the session; narrative follows the vote list with key context noted for select items.

Votes at a glance

- Election of council chair: Christie Cox — nominated and re-elected by voice vote ("Aye" recorded; chair announced reelection). Outcome: elected (no formal roll-call tally recorded).

- Election of council vice chair: Tom Aldett — nominated and seconded; approved by voice vote. Outcome: elected (no roll-call tally recorded).

- Consent agenda: motion approved by voice vote. Outcome: approved (no roll-call tally recorded).

Rezoning and other first-reading items (cases listed by applicant case number shown in meeting text):

1) Case 24-52 (Tax map 46400019) AGC to RUD, 3.02 acres, District 2 — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: 6 yes, 1 no. Outcome: approved (first reading).

2) Case 24-56 (Tax map 6920000032) UD to RSF-30, 2.35 acres, District 5 — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: recorded as unanimous in favor (no opposed recorded). Outcome: approved (first reading).

3) Case 24-57 (Tax map 257000008) AGC to RUD, 7 acres, District 3 — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: 5 yes, 2 no. Outcome: approved (first reading).

4) Case 24-58 (Tax map 529000061) AGC to RUD, 5.2 acres, District 4 — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: motion carried (no roll-call tally recorded). Outcome: approved (first reading).

5) Case 24-59 (Tax map 56100022) RMX-20 to LI (light industrial), 1.47 acres, District 2 ' (dredging business proposal) — Motion to approve rezoning (first reading). Vote: 6 yes, 1 no. Outcome: approved (first reading).

6) Case 24-60 (Tax map 507000041) GC to RI (rural industrial), 1.67 acres, District 5 (power-washing / trade-services proposal) — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: motion carried (no opposed recorded). Outcome: approved (first reading).

7) Case 24-61 (Tax maps 71300143 & 7216) RSF-40 to RMX-10, two parcels totaling 0.71 acres, District 7 — Motion to approve (first reading). Vote: motion carried (no opposed recorded). Outcome: approved (first reading).

8) Case 24-62 (County-initiated rezoning along Sandifer Road) ' consolidated 48 split-zone parcels into AGC-1 or RUD-1 to remove split zoning; two property-owner requests (parcels 302-00048 and 339-00020) were accommodated by amending those two parcels to AGC per owner request. Motion: approve county-initiated rezoning with the two owner-request changes. Vote: motion carried (no roll-call tally recorded). Outcome: approved (first reading).

Context and notable details

- Several rezoning items were contested during public hearings. The light-industrial request (Case 24-59) for a Lake Wylie dredging business prompted extensive public comment: supporters cited safety and access benefits for cove residents and the lake generally; opponents cited neighborhood compatibility concerns and the possibility of "spot zoning." Council approved the request by a 6-1 margin.

- Multiple AGC'to'RUD requests raised a recurring policy issue for council: how to handle existing nonconforming lots and family transfers created by earlier code versions. Several members asked staff to accelerate a broader review of AGC/rural zoning provisions; staff indicated a scope and timeline for a rural-zoning project and suggested the planning & zoning committee would steer the work.

- Several votes were taken as first readings; that means additional formal readings are required before final adoption on each rezoning item unless the council moves otherwise under its rules.

Ending: The meeting recorded the results above as first readings and organizational actions; council instructed staff to continue work on code clarifications and the rural-zoning review in response to questions raised during the hearings.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee