This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The finance committee recommended that the county board approve an intergovernmental agreement to provide regional public transportation with Livingston and Ford counties and forwarded the measure to the full board for Tuesday’s meeting.
Committee members said the agreement would establish a shared public‑transportation arrangement among the counties but warned the county could face future matching‑fund obligations. Committee members also asked for clarity on how counties would select representatives to the new entity and how hiring for a shared site monitor and program staff would proceed.
Committee staff told members the county’s attorney proposed a minor wording change to the agreement’s paragraph about matching funds; the version before the committee requires participating counties to be responsible for “any and all matching funds” as described in paragraph 6. Staff said Livingston and Ford counties will separately vote on the same document and that those counties’ attorneys may submit additional comments.
Committee members raised implementation questions including how the regional entity would be staffed and which county would host initial positions. One member said job descriptions are still being drafted and that some counties have already used the proposed service while others have not returned formal comments.
A motion to recommend approval was made and then confirmed in committee. The motion was made by Don and seconded by Kathy. A roll‑call recorded the following yes votes: Levinson, Wagner, Spartan, Carl and LaF; the committee recommended that the county board take up the agreement at its next meeting.
Because the intergovernmental agreement requires separate votes by the partner counties, the committee noted the county is not yet contractually bound until all jurisdictions complete their approvals or submit changes for negotiation. Staff said any substantial revisions from Livingston or Ford would be returned to the committee for review before the county executes the agreement.
The committee did not set a date for final execution; it forwarded the recommendation and the draft agreement to the full county board for consideration on Tuesday.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,057 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit