This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Livingston Parish School Board voted to revert its 2024–25 district distribution schedule to the 2022–23 per-pupil formula after a lengthy discussion that drew multiple trustees into a debate over equity, facility needs and security funding.
Board members opened the discussion on the proposed 2024–25 weighted distribution schedule and the superintendent’s recommendation. Trustees representing Live Oak and other districts described using redistributed funds last year for plumbing repairs, playground replacements and security camera and related improvements at several campuses. Supporters said the temporary redistribution had produced tangible facility improvements for elementary and junior high campuses.
Opponents argued that a return to a strict per-pupil distribution is more equitable across the parish and urged caution before continuing a reweighted allocation. Several trustees said their campuses continue to have unmet needs — new playgrounds or larger capital projects — and they were reluctant to forgo per-pupil funding until they had assessed all projects.
After competing motions — including a substitute motion to adopt the proposed weighted schedule and a separate motion to revert to the prior per-pupil allocation — the board held roll-call votes. The board clerk announced the substitute motion failed. The subsequent roll-call vote on the motion to revert to the 2022–23 per-pupil distribution was recorded as passing with five yes votes and four no votes, and the board directed staff to implement the per-pupil schedule for 2024–25.
Trustees said they will continue to discuss capital needs and pursue grant opportunities to address security and deferred maintenance issues across the parish.
Votes at a glance: - Motion to revert distribution to the 2022–23 per-pupil formula — Passed (yes: Robert A. Seals Jr.; Jeff Frizzell; Brad Harris; Cecil Harris; Miss Cochran. No: Brad Sharp; Jeff Cox; Dr. Ron McMorris; Steve Link.)
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,138 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit