This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Speakers during the Jan. 9 public comment period urged the board to review library holdings and remove books they said glamorize self-harm and drug use.
One speaker identified herself as Latares and said librarians "need to be accountable" and asked the board to remove books that she described as glorifying opioid use, self‑harm and other harmful behavior. She asked the district to screen books more carefully before they are purchased for schools.
Bruce Friedman said he had reviewed many of the challenged titles and announced he was delivering a formal challenge under district procedures for a Meg Cabot title located at Clay Hill Elementary School. He listed words and themes that concerned him and told the board he would not allow further ordering until the existing materials were reviewed. "Your libraries are polluted," he said. "It's time to step up." Friedman handed the district one challenge form to follow the district’s policy process.
Superintendent Broski later addressed library policy in his administrative remarks, saying the board’s policy places responsibility on parents to choose which books they want for their children and that items violating the law are removed. He described the board-adopted approach as giving parents the ability to select books for their children while removing any items that are violations of law.
Earlier in the agenda the board approved the consent agenda by motion. School board member Miss Gilhausen moved to approve the consent agenda; Ms. Clark seconded. The board called for the vote and the motion carried with a 5‑0 tally. The consent agenda included routine items and the board noted "no special action for human resources." No formal action on specific library titles or a districtwide removal policy was taken at the meeting; two citizens indicated they had submitted or would submit formal challenges for staff review.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,138 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit