Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Literacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District reports double‑year gains in K–2 reading after investments in curriculum and interventions

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

MCPS officials told the board the percentage of second graders meeting DIBELS benchmarks rose 18 percentage points over two years after investments in foundational-skill programs, professional learning and a multi‑tiered intervention field test; staff said gains are promising but called for continued monitoring and targeted supports.

Montgomery County Public Schools officials told the board on Jan. 9 that targeted investments in early literacy — a new knowledge‑building elementary curriculum, expanded foundational‑skills instruction and pay‑for professional learning — correspond with measurable gains in early-grade reading.

Malaika Brown, elementary English language arts supervisor, summarized three years of work in grades K–2 and said the district’s dynamic indicator (DIBELS) results show improvement for the cohort now in second grade. “From the fall of their kindergarten year to the fall of their grade‑2 year, the percentage of students at or above the benchmark increased by 18 percentage points,” Brown said, adding that the increase represents almost 1,600 additional second graders reading at grade level compared with two years ago.

Officials connected the gains to three changes: adoption and district training on the Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) curriculum and aligned foundational‑skills programs (described in the meeting as “Really Great Reading”), expanded use of DIBELS for progress monitoring, and a pilot field test of the multi‑tiered system of supports (MTSS) and parent‑facing reporting tools.

Chief of Schools Peter Moran described the MTSS field test and family engagement components. He said five field‑test schools used Synergy‑generated parent reports and monthly data chats; caregiver surveys at test schools showed 70% of caregivers reported knowing how their child was doing in reading and 61% said they received conferences about intervention progress. “Schools that are implementing with fidelity and monitoring these interventions are seeing growth,” Moran said, citing specific elementary schools with double‑digit gains.

District officials also gave a rough ‘‘return‑on‑investment’’ estimate for the cohort: staff said roughly $1.84 million of literacy program investment corresponded to the cohort’s observed gain, which the presentation divided down to about $102,000 per percentage point across the full cohort (district staff emphasized this as a back‑of‑envelope figure to illustrate scale, not a causal proof).

Why it matters: Literacy by third grade is a widely used milestone tied to later academic success and to state promotion frameworks. Board members pressed for more detailed disaggregation and asked how to help families use district reports and at‑home activities. Staff said DIBELS home‑connect reports and CKLA parent letters are available (English and Spanish translations are being expanded) and that LETRS training capacity is being increased where budget allows.

What’s next: Staff said the district will continue progress monitoring, expand MTSS documentation and follow up on school‑level fidelity concerns raised in the quarter‑1 analysis; principals and directors were already working on targeted follow‑ups at schools that showed less growth. Officials also noted Maryland’s newly adopted pre‑K–3 literacy policy and said MCPS would continue aligning instruction and communications with state guidance.

Limitations: The district described the DIBELS snapshots as fall results (three administrations are planned: fall, winter and spring) and emphasized that some kindergarten variability is expected because not all incoming kindergartners have the same pre‑K experience. Officials also warned that the ROI figure presented is an illustrative metric and not a formal cost‑effectiveness study.