Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Collections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sumner County library board debates sexually explicit passages in youth‑accessible books; book‑signing rule sent back to committee
Summary
Board Chair Joanna Daniels read excerpts she said were circulating in Sumner County libraries and argued they violated the system's collection development policy. The board discussed policy clarifications and returned a draft book‑signing policy to the Policies & Bylaws committee for revision.
Sumner County Library Board Chair Joanna Daniels urged the board on Jan. 8 to review how the system applies its collection development policy after she read excerpts from several books she said were either shelved in young‑adult sections or otherwise accessible to children.
Daniels said the passages included graphic sexual descriptions and images and told the board she was concerned they were available in areas children could reach. She also cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent — Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) — during her remarks as background for legal questions about indecency and public access.
The board spent more than an hour discussing whether and how to apply existing policy language to events such as author signings and to material circulating in public stacks. County legal counsel told the board that any board action to bar a book or to object to a signing would need to follow open‑meetings rules and that a written, majority objection must itself be part of an open meeting before it could block an event.
Members debated strict language in a draft book‑signing policy that would require library staff to email the board the titles for any signing and permit the board to block a signing by a majority written objection. Several trustees said the procedure could be impractical for events that arise between scheduled meetings, and others said the policy should allow for contextual review rather than an absolute, zero‑tolerance rule.
After discussion, the board voted to send the proposed book‑signing policy back to the Policies & Bylaws committee for revision so it can provide clearer procedures for timely review and to reconcile the policy with open‑meetings requirements.
“Because children can access parts of our shelves, we must make sure our collection policy is being applied consistently,” Daniels said. Eric Sibler, the county attorney, advised the board on meeting and objection procedures.
Board members directed the Policies & Bylaws committee to return a revised draft that clarifies what constitutes an adults‑only event, how titles will be circulated to trustees for review, and how short‑notice events would be handled.
