Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collection Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board chair raises concerns about sexually explicit material available to children at Sumner Family Library
Summary
At the Jan. 8 meeting, the board chair read passages she said were from library books and asked the board to ensure compliance with the library’s collection and development policy.
Board chair Joanna Daniels told the Sumner County Library Board on Jan. 8 that she has been made aware of books on library shelves that she said contain graphic sexual content and said those items may violate the library’s collection and development policy.
Daniels read portions of material she described as explicit and said the books were located in areas of the Sumner Family Library accessible to children. She asked the board to address whether the items comply with the collection policy and suggested placing related material on the record so the public and trustees can comment.
Why it matters: Trustees are the public stewards of library collections and must interpret collection policies when disagreements about content arise. Daniels said the board should make sure the library’s collection and development policy is being applied consistently and that children are not exposed to material the policy bars.
Daniels told the board: “This has been brought to my attention that some of this material is in our Sumner Family Library and is in violation of our collection and development policy and available for children to have access to.”
She also cited a judicial decision by title — as presented at the meeting — discussing public indecency and said that, in her view, the content described could be legally indecent in public contexts. The board’s attorney did not render an immediate legal ruling at the meeting; board members and staff discussed next steps including reviewing the books’ categorization and the collection policy language.
Board members asked how the issue should be handled procedurally and whether specific titles should be subject to review in an open meeting or by staff. The board did not remove materials or take a formal vote at the Jan. 8 meeting; members assigned the issue for follow-up so staff can verify placement and policy compliance and so the board can consider any recommended changes.
Ending: The board said staff will review the titles and placement, confirm whether policy criteria were met, and report findings to the board for possible action.
