Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Landmarks Board approves demolition for 2725 5th Street; owner cited estate and financial reasons
Summary
The Landmarks Board voted unanimously to approve demolition of the circa‑1910 house at 2725 5th Street, finding the building does not meet individual‑landmark criteria and that rehabilitation would be financially impractical for the estate's managers.
The Boulder Landmarks Board on Jan. 8 unanimously approved demolition of a circa‑1910 home at 2725 5th Street, concluding the property does not meet the threshold for individual landmark designation and that repairing and bringing the house to code would be financially impractical for the estate’s executors.
Staff analysis found the house retains historic materials and vernacular character, but does not possess the level of historic, architectural or environmental significance required for an individual landmark under Boulder Revised Code §9‑1‑123. Staff also reviewed an owner‑supplied structural engineer’s memo and repair estimates that recommended foundation replacement, roof framing reinforcement and other work; those items, staff said, would be costly to complete.
Owner’s statement: Chris (Kristen) Houston, representing the estate of Cheryl Lynn Thompson, told the board she and her brother have tried to market the property but have received only interest from buyers seeking to demolish the building. Houston asked the board to follow staff recommendations and approve demolition so the estate can close probate in a timely manner.
Board action: After staff and owner presentations and a brief public comment period, the Landmarks Board voted unanimously to approve demolition. Staff noted the approval is valid for 180 days and that a deconstruction permit must be obtained within that period; if a permit is not obtained, the owner would need to reapply. Because of a recent code change, staff noted that future approvals will be valid for one year for applications submitted after Jan. 19, 2025, but this application falls under the existing timeline.
Neighborhood questions: Public commenters urged the board to consider alternatives or delay demolition to explore reuse options; staff and the owner said they examined options but that the estate’s financial constraints and the condition of the house limit practical alternatives.
Ending: With the unanimous vote, the owner may pursue demolition and sale options subject to the usual permitting and deconstruction requirements.
