Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Occupancy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews caretaker unit proposal for light-industrial property on South Tehama Street
Summary
Staff presented DR-246, a design review request for a small caretaker's residence at 900 South Tehama Street; staff recommended approval based on compatibility with the site’s existing business and municipal code criteria, but the transcript does not record a final vote.
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Occupancy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Willows Planning Commission heard a staff presentation on Jan. 7 regarding design review file DR-246, a request to establish a caretaker’s unit at 900 South Tehama Street in a light-industrial zone.
Staff said the property contains a 15-by-40-foot storage shed and a 360-square-foot office building that the applicant proposes to renovate and expand by 248 square feet to create a small caretaker’s residence. Under the municipal code, staff said a caretaker’s residence can be allowed in the light-industrial zone if the legally established use on the site requires continuous supervision by a caretaker or security person; the property owner stated a need for an on-site security presence tied to the business operating there.
Staff said the proposed caretaker unit would match the design and color scheme of the existing buildings on the site, using light-colored metal siding and a blue metal roof; staff noted the blue roof color is not on the city’s approved natural-color list but described it as an existing accent. Staff recommended approval and stood for questions. The transcript shows discussion and an apparent second to a motion but does not record a roll-call vote or final recorded outcome in the excerpt.
Why it matters: approving a caretaker residence changes the residential character of a property in a light-industrial zone and establishes on-site living tied to business security needs. The commission’s decision could affect enforcement of zoning limits and future uses on similar sites.
Next steps: the transcript does not record the final vote or any conditions of approval; building permit, occupancy and enforcement details were not specified.

