Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge county to pause dense subdivisions as traffic, wildlife and infrastructure worries grow in north end
Summary
Public commenters at the Escambia County pre-meeting forum urged commissioners to reconsider proposed higher-density development in District 5, citing traffic, drainage, wildlife (including gopher tortoises), and school capacity concerns.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Megan Walters, a resident who identified herself as from District 5, told the Escambia County Board of County Commissioners during the public forum that commissioners should "take the time to ride with our police, fire, and EMS" to better understand public-safety and community needs and that she was "very concerned" about traffic and school capacity ahead of new subdivisions.
The comments came during the county's pre-meeting public forum, where several residents from the north end — including Cecilia Campbell and a long-time property owner who identified himself as a District 5 resident on Mackenzie Road — warned that proposed subdivisions would increase traffic, strain evacuation routes, and threaten wildlife habitats. Campbell said residents felt "desperate" and that many were unaware when zoning or sector-plan changes were being considered. She asked commissioners to reconsider parts of the Midwest Sector Plan, which she said appears to allow developers to opt out of required amenities such as multi-use paths and street lights.
Neil Beadle (identified in the forum as a long-time resident) and another District 5 resident described drainage and topography issues in the Cottage Hill/Mackenzie Road area. Beadle said parts of the roads "flood every time it rains" and described steep slopes, springs and a natural pond that contribute to frequent overflows. He said the area includes wetlands and a 40-degree slope area that could be affected by large-scale grading.
Commissioner Mary (identified in the forum remarks as a member of the Escambia County commission) responded during the forum that the county recently resurfaced Cottage Hill roads and that the project under discussion appeared to be at an initial pre-application stage with Planning Services. Mary said she had not met with the proposer and that Planning staff had not received a formal submission. Mary also acknowledged the bridging and flooding problems residents described and noted the public forum is an opportunity for residents to raise issues directly with the commission.
Why it matters: Residents said traffic, stormwater and school capacity raise public-safety and quality-of-life questions for any higher-density rezoning or subdivision approvals. Several commenters tied environmental concerns — including mentions of federally protected species such as the gopher tortoise — to potential impacts of grading and drainage changes.
Details and context: Walters thanked Commissioner Steven (full name not provided in the forum) for visible emergency response during Hurricane Sally and noted that District 5 is the county's largest district by land mass. Campbell said developers sometimes seek lower development standards to avoid installing sidewalks and other infrastructure. Beadle pressed the commission on drainage and said a county holding pond and a natural spring already contribute to periodic road closures.
Next steps: County staff and Planning Services typically evaluate pre-application feedback, stormwater and traffic analyses, and any required environmental reviews before a formal application is accepted. At the forum, Mary said no formal application had been filed and flagged that residents may continue to provide input during staff review and any future public hearings.

