Planning commission reviews Belk Home Services building expansion; requests screening and striping details
Loading...
Summary
Commissioners discussed a proposed two‑section expansion at 350 Emma Street for Belk Home Services and requested additional screening for parked trailers and an updated parking‑lot striping plan; the item was a special review and no formal vote was taken.
Belk Home Services presented a conceptual special review to the Findlay City Planning Commission on Jan. 9 for expansions to its facility at 350 Emma Street.
The applicant described a 1,692‑square‑foot shop addition on the north side of the building and a 2,003‑square‑foot office addition on the east side for meetings and training; the existing portion will remain warehouse/storage. "We do have a conceptual parking plan where we're looking at about 60 plus parking spaces," the applicant said, adding there would be no semi‑trailer parking for the proposed operation.
Staff flagged two items for the full site plan submittal: an updated striping plan to ensure parking meets zoning standards and screening details for a north‑side area where trailers currently park. Commissioners generally supported the plan as an improvement for the corridor but asked that the applicant provide screening — either landscaping or fencing — along the north edge near a neighboring motel and consider symmetry with landscaping at nearby developments. Engineering staff advised the applicant to secure any needed taps or curb‑cut permits during final plan review.
Belk representatives said they may use movable storage containers to secure recycling and that deliveries typically use box trucks that would enter the rear yard; they also said they will add cameras and other site security measures. Commissioners encouraged green buffering over fencing where practical and asked the applicant to consider narrowing an oversized drive approach if semis will no longer use the site.
Because this item was a preliminary special review, staff asked the applicant to supply final striping and screening details for review during the formal site plan process; no formal action was taken by the commission at this meeting.
