Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members debate longer replacement window for mobile homes, ask for study
Summary
Council discussion on Oct. 16 raised the possibility of extending the existing six-month deadline to replace nonconforming mobile homes; several members supported extending to about a year to allow for financing, legal or personal delays, and staff were asked to bring a formal ordinance option back to a future meeting.
At the Oct. 16 meeting, council members discussed whether to extend the six-month period that allows owners of nonconforming mobile homes to replace the unit on the same parcel.
Councilman Marlon Lewis said six months can pass quickly for residents facing complex personal circumstances such as divorce or legal delays. “Six months just seem like a — it goes so fast,” he said, adding that a 12-month window would help owners obtain financing and replace a unit without creating a vacant lot.
Several council members and the mayor supported the idea of studying a longer replacement period. Councilwoman Deedee Johnson Reed and others noted the federal government and some grant programs are promoting manufactured and modular housing as affordable options and suggested the city evaluate both modular alternatives and protections to prevent long-term blight.
Planning staff and the city attorney clarified the legal framework: the zoning code currently allows a nonconforming mobile home location to be replaced within six months; any change to that allowance requires an ordinance amendment and typically begins with planning-and-zoning review before returning to council for adoption.
Council members directed staff to place the item on a future agenda for formal consideration and to include information on: comparable timelines in nearby communities; financing timelines for manufactured or modular homes; code edits that would preserve neighborhood character while allowing affordable housing options; and how any change would affect demolition and nuisance-abatement procedures.
