Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinances Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Watertown council adopts zoning amendment and revises stop-intersection ordinance; votes 9–0 and 8–1

2094438 · January 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On second reading the council approved Ordinance 24-33 amending Chapter 550 (zoning and floodplain/shoreland-wetland sections) on a 9–0 roll call and Ordinance 24-34 amending stop intersections in Chapter 500-3b on an 8–1 roll call.

The Watertown Common Council approved two ordinances on second reading during its Jan. 7 meeting: Ordinance 24-33, an amendment to the city's zoning and floodplain/shoreland-wetland chapters, and Ordinance 24-34, a change to the stop-intersection sections of the municipal code.

Ordinance 24-33, described by staff as amendments to Chapter 550 (including sections 550-38 through 550-43, and sections 150 and 152) and to Chapter 532 (floodplain and shoreland wetland zoning), was moved by Councilmember Davis and seconded by Councilmember Lampe. In a roll call vote the following members voted aye: Davis; Lampe; Ford; Parts; Blankey; Smith; Schmidt; Wetzel; Moldenhauer. The presiding officer announced, "Motion passed 9–0." No nay or abstentions were recorded in the meeting transcript.

Ordinance 24-34, described as an amendment to Chapter 500-3b (stop intersections) and presented from public safety and welfare, was moved by Councilmember Blankie and seconded by Councilmember Bartz. The roll call showed the following votes: Lanke (aye); Smith (aye); Schmidt (no); Wetzel (aye); Moldenhauer (aye); Davis (aye); Lampe (aye); Board (aye); Parts (aye). The presiding officer announced, "Motion passed 8 to 1." The transcript records Councilmember Schmidt as the lone no vote; no abstentions or recusals were recorded.

Both ordinances were recorded as second-reading approvals by the council; no amendments to the ordinances were recorded in the transcript during the meeting.