Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency And Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County attorney delivers annual training on Utah open meetings, records and ethics laws
Summary
San Juan County’s attorney presented required annual training covering the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) and the Utah Public Officers Employee Ethics Act, including notice, recording, closed-meeting rules and penalties for violations.
San Juan County’s annual training session on transparency and ethics was presented by the county attorney, Mitch, who reviewed the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) and the Utah Public Officers Employee Ethics Act.
The attorney emphasized that “the act requires that the public’s business be done in public,” summarizing notice requirements, minute and recording obligations, and the statutory reasons and procedures for closing a meeting. He noted that regular open meetings require at least 24 hours’ notice, an agenda described with reasonable specificity, and both audio recordings and written minutes except in limited statutory circumstances. He also explained that a majority vote is required to close a meeting and that a roll call recording of votes is required for any closed session that later must be justified in sworn statements.
On records access under GRAMA, the attorney summarized that public records are presumed open unless specifically classified by statute as private, controlled or protected; that requesters need not provide a purpose to request records; and that reasonable copying or compilation fees may be charged but that review time to determine whether a record is public may not be billed to the requester. He discussed the county’s authority to collect county-held electronic records and cautioned commissioners that county business conducted on personal devices can become subject to records requests.
On ethics, the attorney warned that officials cannot use information learned in their official capacity for personal gain and reiterated conflict-of-interest rules required under the Utah Public Officers Employee Ethics Act.
Why it matters: The briefing covered statutory duties that shape meeting practice, records disclosure, and the legal exposure and penalties for noncompliance. The training was presented to satisfy annual training and record-keeping requirements.
Follow-up: The attorney said he will email training materials to commissioners and provide an abbreviated GRAMA guide. Commissioners asked clarifying questions about roll-call procedures for closed meetings and access to emails and phones used for county business.
