Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

District outlines ad hoc review of challenged library books, citing obscenity statute and age-appropriateness criteria

2090826 · January 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district formed an ad hoc committee of middle- and high-school library media specialists to review roughly 160 challenged titles; staff described a three-tier review using the Miller test (TCA 39-17-901), statutory age-appropriateness definitions, and librarian professional judgment. Ten title reviews will be presented to the board Thursday.

Rutherford County Schools staff described an ad hoc district-level committee review process for approximately 160 library books challenged by patrons. The committee, composed initially of middle- and high-school library media specialists, has been evaluating titles using a three-tiered approach: first, an obscenity screen using the Miller-test standards and TCA 39-17-901; second, statutory age-appropriateness definitions that the district referenced; and third, routine librarian collection-development and grade-band considerations.

Staff said the review committee has at least two readers per title; where the first two reviewers disagree, a blind third reader serves as…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans