Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Fund Balance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves financial monitoring reports; members press for operational forecasting and Fund 46 briefing
Summary
The school board approved OE‑9 and OE‑10 monitoring reports. Trustees and staff discussed incomplete strategic budget mapping, a possible drop in fund balance below the 20–33% target, the use of Forecast5 software and a request to add operational referendum forecasting and self-insurance impacts to future reports.
The Eau Claire Area School District board approved two financial-monitoring reports (OE‑9 and OE‑10) after a detailed discussion about aligning budget planning with strategic goals and clarifying how the district will report fund-balance and forecasting information to the board and public.
Administrators said OE‑9 (budget and financial planning) is in overall compliance but noted an exception: strategic budget mapping and broader staff engagement in aligning budgets with results policies remain incomplete. Dr. Mark Ellworthy, executive director of business services, described plans to expand participation and use budgeting tools such as Forecast5 to produce earlier and clearer projections.
“We need more information, more voice, and then getting feedback, and then developing budgets,” Dr. Ellworthy said, describing the district’s aim to align staffing and budget development simultaneously rather than sequentially.
Superintendent Johnson told the board OE‑10 (financial administration) is largely in compliance. Johnson also warned that the district’s fund balance, measured as a percent of budget, "may be below approximately 19.3" at the end of the school year, short of the 20–33% range auditors have recommended. Johnson and other administrators said that because the district increased its budget by roughly $18 million following a recent referendum, the fund-balance percentage can fall even if the dollar amount remains stable.
Board members asked staff to include operational-referendum forecasting and potential effects of a move to self-funded insurance in future monitoring reports. Several trustees said having forecasts and clearer long-term operational planning would help the board weigh compensation and staffing decisions and would improve public transparency.
Dr. Ellworthy also described Fund 46 as a tool the district can use to set aside capital dollars for future projects. "We can’t touch it for five years, but it allows us to manage the levy," he said, and he told trustees a separate presentation on Fund 46 and the district’s 10‑year capital plan will be scheduled.
The OE‑9 and OE‑10 motions were moved, seconded and approved by voice vote. Trustees also noted scheduling details: the audit report and federal single-audit work are in progress and planned to be reported to the board in the coming weeks.
Trustees asked for an additional indicator next year tied to fund-balance restoration if the district falls below board-established targets and requested board development sessions on budget topics so all members can review forecasting, referendum impacts and compensation models.
