Commission hears notice of duplicate road-name issue; public warned about cost of renaming

2087694 · January 6, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning commissioners were briefed on a duplicated road name created by a failed subdivision loop and were told a public hearing and formal renaming request will likely appear on a future agenda.

OCONEE COUNTY, S.C. — The Oconee County Planning Commission on Monday was briefed about a duplicated road-name issue in a failed subdivision and heard a public comment urging the commission to consider the financial impact of renaming for people who live or operate businesses on affected roads.

County staff said a subdivision road planned as a loop was not completed; the unfinished loop now creates two different road segments in opposite directions that share a single name. Staff said the GIS office had flagged the problem and that the matter would likely be scheduled for a public hearing in March or April when the county receives a formal renaming package.

The packet from addressing/GIS, staff said, typically includes a justification for the name change, tax map numbers for affected properties, a map, three proposed alternate road names, signatures from 75% of property owners affected by the change and the required fee. "There are considerable considerations for somebody, especially if there's a lot of people that already hold on the road, whether it has to be changed, it can be quite a long time," staff said.

In public comment, Tom Markovich warned of the cost to residents and businesses when street names change: "There is a phenomenal, in some cases, financial impact on people that are living on a particular road, and all of a sudden their road changes. And especially if they operate a business on any 1 of these given roads, and they have to begin changing everything." Staff confirmed the commission would receive the GIS package and hold a public hearing before making a decision; no vote or formal action occurred on the matter Monday.

Ending: Staff expects to bring a formal renaming request to a future meeting with the GIS packet and public-notice requirements; commissioners did not take any formal vote at Monday's meeting.