Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals Court weighs necessity defense, unanimity instruction and juror accommodations in Mendez appeal

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Justin Dashner asked the Appeals Court to reverse on necessity, unanimity and juror‑accommodation grounds in Commonwealth v. Eduardo Mendez.

Justin Dashner, counsel for Eduardo Mendez, asked the Appeals Court to reverse parts of Mendez’s conviction on multiple grounds: the denial of a necessity jury instruction for an assault and battery charge in violation of a restraining order; the absence of a specific unanimity instruction for multiple alleged touchings; and trial‑court handling of juror issues including a hard‑of‑hearing juror and a juror with professional expertise in memory.

Dashner said Mendez admitted the physical contact but insisted his testimony showed he grabbed the complainant to prevent her from jumping…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans