Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Debt Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves UMB Financial Services as municipal adviser after debt-capacity briefing

2086241 · January 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

UMB provided a county debt overview and the board approved a $15,000 engagement letter authorizing UMB to serve as Woodbury County’s municipal adviser when the county issues future debt.

UMB Financial Services representative Nate Summers updated the Woodbury County Board of Supervisors on the county’s outstanding debt and debt capacity and the board approved an engagement letter for UMB to act as the county’s municipal adviser.

Summers summarized valuation growth over recent years, reviewed principal and interest schedules for existing capital loan notes and the law enforcement center financing, and said the county’s statutory debt capacity was about 11 percent used with roughly $492,000,000 of remaining capacity. He noted the county’s law-enforcement–center special levy had fallen to about 58 cents from roughly 85 cents as valuations increased.

Summers described services UMB would provide if engaged, including structuring debt, mapping capital plans and filing annual investor reports tied to bond covenants. The engagement letter discussed at the meeting carries a $15,000 fee that Summers said is payable only if the county issues debt under the engagement.

Board action: Supervisors voted unanimously to receive the presentation materials and then unanimously approved the engagement letter to retain UMB as municipal adviser. No immediate debt issuance was authorized at the meeting.

Why it matters: The engagement gives Woodbury County a designated municipal adviser to assist with future capital financings and investor reporting; the presentation also provided the board context on the county’s current leverage and levy impacts for budgeting.