Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Media Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates social media policy on First Amendment and administrative control during first reading
Summary
Council heard a first reading of a proposed social media policy intended to guide city-managed accounts and comment moderation; aldermen raised First Amendment concerns and requested more written detail before final action.
The Freeport City Council held a first reading of a proposed social media policy (Ordinance 202503) on Jan. 7, prompting extended discussion about how the city will balance moderation, transparency and legal risk.
City Communications staff presented the seven-page draft, which the administration described as a framework to govern city-operated accounts and clarify who may administer pages. The policy as presented states that public comments on city pages "are that user's opinion only" and that publication of a comment does not imply government endorsement. It also enumerates categories of content that may be removed or restricted, including content that "promotes discrimination," that violates copyright, that threatens a person or organization, that includes personally identifiable information, or that is obscene or pornographic.
Several council members raised constitutional concerns. Alderman Monroe warned that allowing administrators to remove or block posts could expose the city to First Amendment claims and reduce transparency, citing a recent court settlement he said occurred in another jurisdiction. Alderman Monroe asked for clearer definitions of terms such as "discrimination" and "obscene" and expressed worry about who on staff would have unilateral authority to block comments. Other aldermen—including Alderman Bridal and Alderman Sanders—said the draft policy provides needed guidance and could improve transparency compared with the status quo, where moderation practices were handled without written standards.
Communications staff said the city manager oversees administrators and that, in practice, the communications director is the primary administrator but other staff may have access when needed. Staff emphasized that decisions are not made unilaterally and that the policy is intended to give both guidance and guardrails for administrators. Councilmembers asked staff to provide written protocols and to continue the conversation at subsequent meetings.
The ordinance remained at first reading for later consideration; no final vote was taken.
