Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HR presents total‑rewards updates; board weighs extending military pay differential past required leave
Summary
Cabarrus County human resources staff reviewed total rewards changes and recommended ordinance clarifications and a stipend/differential for military leave beyond the required paid leave; commissioners debated eligibility timing for floating holidays.
Cabarrus County human resources staff presented the fourth and (they called it) "hopefully final" report on total‑rewards benefits at the Jan. 6 meeting, and proposed small ordinance clarifications and a new supplement for employees called to military service.
Why it matters: The county said it has lagged peer jurisdictions on several benefits and that targeted, relatively low‑cost changes aim to improve recruitment and retention. Commissioners asked about eligibility timing and expressed differing views on whether new employees should immediately receive some benefits.
Lundy Covington of Human Resources reviewed projects the department implemented since the board retreat: floating holidays, paid parental bonding leave, bereavement updates and other changes staff described as "low cost but high impact." Covington said the county saw a positive uptick in employee engagement and that some new benefits (for example paid parental bonding implemented in September) had already been used by employees (13 requests by the date of the meeting).
On military leave, Covington said the county currently provides 120 paid hours per calendar year for required training or active duty and that after the paid hours employees must use personal leave, comp time or go to leave without pay (LWOP). Staff surveyed employees and peer counties and reported mixed practices. Covington said the 120 hours is the "bare minimum" required for UCIRA job‑protection leave (as discussed at the meeting) and recommended adding a salary differential stipend for employees whose county pay exceeds military pay if a deployment extends beyond the 120 paid hours; the proposed stipend would be available up to six months and would only supplement when county pay is higher.
Covington also proposed two ordinance clarifications: require employees be active on Jan. 1 to be eligible for the floating holiday and the personal leave day (to make annual administrative loading simpler), and add language to ensure accrual credit for benefits while employees are on LWOP for military service (so retirement accruals are not lost when employees elect LWOP). Commissioners discussed the Jan. 1 eligibility cutoff: one commissioner suggested reducing the waiting period to six months; Covington clarified that the military stipend would apply to all military employees regardless of hire date.
What remains open: Board members expressed different views about the floating‑holiday eligibility timeline and asked staff to consider that new veterans should not be penalized; staff said they will adjust language as needed and continue to consult with the board. Any change to provide a pay differential would require direction from the board and budget analysis for the potential six‑month stipend.
Ending: HR staff asked for direction to draft personnel ordinance language reflecting the discussed changes and for the board to consider a six‑month stipend window if it wishes. Covington said staff would return with ordinance language and cost estimates.
