Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission authorizes Carl Vinson Institute charter review; substitute motion to add legislative appointment fails
Summary
The commission approved contracting with the University of Georgia's Carl Vinson Institute to conduct a charter review for Augusta-Richmond County. A proposed amendment to add a legislative appointment and require referendum of legislative recommendations was discussed but not adopted; the body approved the original resolution 6–4.
Augusta’s City Commission on Jan. 7 approved engaging the University of Georgia’s Carl Vinson Institute to assist with a Richmond County charter review and to draft a committee resolution.
Commission debate focused on committee composition and the role of the local legislative delegation. Commissioner Jordan Johnson proposed a substitute amendment to the approval that would add one legislative-delegation appointment to the review committee and require that any recommendations the legislature returned be placed on a public referendum. The substitute attracted a second but the commission ultimately rejected competing amendments and approved the base engagement as presented.
During debate several commissioners raised concerns about partisan influence if the legislative delegation were given a formal seat on the review committee. Others said the delegation will be involved in the legislative phase regardless and suggested working with delegation leadership rather than adding a seat. Administrator Allen and staff noted the engagement had a specified scope of deliverables and a timeline; cost and precise deliverables were discussed but a definitive dollar amount was not specified in the public discussion.
The substitute to add the legislative appointment did not carry; the commission approved the original resolution to contract with the Carl Vinson Institute by a vote of 6–4. The clerk recorded the vote as 6 in favor, 4 opposing. The commission directed staff to proceed with the institute’s contract and begin work under the terms presented to the commission.
