Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Storage Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasadena opens public hearing on extension of commercial moratorium for battery storage; no council vote
Summary
The City of Pasadena opened a public hearing on Jan. 7 on extending a commercial moratorium that halts permits for battery energy storage systems. No formal action was taken; few speakers addressed the moratorium and some residents pressed for greater transparency on battery contracts and sourcing.
The Pasadena City Council opened a public hearing Tuesday, Jan. 7, on a proposed extension of the city's commercial moratorium on permits for battery energy storage system facilities. The hearing was held at 10 a.m. in the council chamber; the city secretary read the hearing purpose aloud.
The hearing matter, read by the city secretary, described the purpose as: "A public hearing at 10 AM in the council chamber city hall for the purpose of hearing public comments on the extension of the commercial moratorium imposed by the city of Pasadena, Texas on the issuance of permits for the placement and installation of battery energy storage system facilities within the jurisdiction of the city." The council opened the floor for public comment even though no one had signed up in advance.
Only a small number of residents addressed the moratorium. One frequent public commenter, Taz Smith, said he opposed the city spending on batteries and called for "a complete audit and oversight" of any battery-related spending or contracting. Smith also urged the council to use unedited livestreams for its votes, saying the city had exercised "a 100% lack of transparency." He raised concerns about where battery suppliers obtain minerals and said citizens should scrutinize sourcing.
No councilmember moved to amend or end the moratorium during the hearing, and the council did not take a vote on the extension at the meeting. After public remarks concluded, the mayor closed the hearing and the council proceeded to other agenda items.
Why it matters: the moratorium governs when and how companies can obtain city permits to install battery storage facilities, a technology used for grid support and renewable-energy projects. Community members who spoke raised transparency and procurement questions; council members did not take formal action or schedule a vote during the Jan. 7 meeting.
The hearing record did not show staff presenting technical findings or a timeline for a subsequent vote. The city did not provide further detail at the meeting on proposed duration of any extension or on standards the council would apply when considering permit applications.
