Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Somerville resident urges Dorchester County to tighten animal-control code and enforcement
Summary
Resident Cheryl Mendoza told council the county’s animal ordinances lack specific definitions for shelter, tethering and enforcement tools; council members said ordinances have been strengthened in recent years and noted a new memorandum of understanding with the town of Summerville.
Cheryl Mendoza, a Somerville resident, urged Dorchester County Council on Jan. 6 to strengthen the county’s animal-control ordinance and give animal-control officers clearer standards and enforcement tools.
"Dogs are considered property," Mendoza said, adding that current county language leaves too many details undefined. "Definition of a proper tether is outlined, but no mention of a rope. Proper shelter is not defined. So if being outside 24/7 in 90‑degree days and freezing nights, is your idea proper treatment?"
Mendoza described a case in which Dorchester Paws returned a microchipped dog to what she said were neglectful owners and said she was told staff were following state protocol. She said the county ordinance does not provide sufficient backing for animal-control officers to order remedial action.
A council member and the deputy county attorney responded that the county has strengthened animal-control ordinances over the past four years and that enforcement can be challenged in magistrate courts. The council member also referenced a recent memorandum of understanding between Dorchester County and the town of Summerville that affects jurisdiction.
Mendoza asked the council to take steps to "give animal control the tools they need, strengthen, and define the municipal code." Council members encouraged her to return with proposed language and stay involved.
