Citizen Portal
Sign In

Committee discusses reinstating assistant superintendent post; superintendent’s recommendation required

2064161 · January 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members debated whether to reinstate an assistant/associate superintendent position. Counsel and members said the superintendent must initiate such a recommendation, and the committee could not unreasonably withhold approval under state law.

The Springfield School Committee discussed the possibility of reinstating an assistant or associate superintendent position but did not vote to create or fund the role at the meeting.

Members raised organizational and succession-planning reasons for the position; several speakers noted the district had previously had such roles. Committee member Mister Gonzales cited Chapter 71, Section 59 and said the statute requires the superintendent to recommend such appointments and allows the committee to approve or disapprove the recommendation. Attorney Murphy and other counsel confirmed the committee’s authority is exercised after a superintendent recommendation, and the committee agreed it would defer action unless Dr. Denault brings a formal recommendation. Counsel also noted there is currently no funded position for an assistant superintendent and that any change would have budget implications.

Several members said they were supportive of providing the superintendent whatever organizational tools she needs, while also underscoring the committee’s responsibility to review compensation and budget impacts. Members proposed taking the item to subcommittee and holding a working session to allow a fuller discussion before any formal vote.