Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Broadband Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve dozens of right-of-way permits for fiber and water repairs as part of county projects
Summary
The court approved multiple utility line and right-of-way agreements, including extensive fiber-optic installations by Bratzspeed tied to the county's ARPA broadband expansion effort, and separate road-bore and repair permits for local water suppliers.
Henderson County Commissioners approved multiple right-of-way and utility line permits covering fiber-optic installation and water-system repairs on county roads.
Commissioner Spivey presented permits for Bratzspeed for aerial and buried fiber along Veterans Lane and County Road 2105 and described additional segments across the county. Commissioner Tully later summarized an extensive packet of 15 right-of-way requests from Bratzspeed that covered more than 30 road segments and many stretches described in feet — for example, "aerial 106 feet west of Scott Street," "aerial 1,003 feet east of Scott Street," and directional bore segments of multiple thousands of feet in other locations — all of which the court approved.
When a commissioner asked whether the fiber work was part of the county's ARPA broadband expansion, the presenter replied, "Yes, sir." The court passed motions to approve the Bratzspeed agreements with the commissioners' authorization to sign.
The court also approved proposed utility activity for Leadville Water Supply Company (a two-inch PVC casing road bore at 9305 County Road 3622) and multiple repair permits for Moore Station Water Supply Company to fix leaks at addresses on County Roads 3418 and 3605. Those motions passed unanimously.
Why it matters: commissioners said the fiber permits are part of the county's broadband-expansion efforts funded in part by ARPA, a priority for connecting rural areas. The right-of-way approvals clear the way for contractors to begin work on county roads and require coordination with county engineers and inspectors.
Details: county staff noted the county had negotiated engineering coordination with the contractor, and one commissioner asked that the maps and permits be filed with the meeting minutes. The court approved that request as part of the record.
