The Maricopa Unified School District governing board on Oct. 22 voted on a series of procedural and action items, approving the agenda, consent agenda, personnel schedule, a donation of unsold furniture, acceptance of a school‑site donation assignment and adjourning to executive session for the superintendent’s quarterly progress evaluation.

Key votes at a glance
- Adopt agenda: Motion seconded and approved by recorded voice votes (Shontay Rothschild, Ben Owens, Carolyn Lopez, Patty Cutre recorded as "Aye"). Mover not specified on the record in the transcript.

- Consent agenda: Motion made, seconded and approved by roll call with Shontay Rothschild, Ben Owens, Carolyn Lopez and Patty Cutre recorded as "Aye." (Consent items not read individually in public comments.)

- Personnel schedule: After brief discussion about student internships and hiring, the board approved the personnel schedule; votes recorded as "Aye" from Shontay Rothschild, Ben Owens, Carolyn Lopez and Patty Cutre.

- Donation of unsold furniture to Boys & Girls Club: Board approved the donation. Recorded votes: Shontay Rothschild — Aye; Ben Owens — Aye; Carolyn Lopez — Aye; Patty Cutre — Abstain. A board member announced an intended abstention before the vote because of an association with the Boys & Girls Club; the public roll call shows Patty Cutre as the abstaining member.

- Acceptance of school site donation assignment for Arden Trails (from Casa Grande Elementary School District): Motion made and seconded; no dissent recorded on the meeting transcript and item proceeded.

- Executive session for superintendent evaluation: The board voted to adjourn into executive session for the superintendent’s quarterly progress evaluation pursuant to the Arizona open meetings provisions stated in the meeting materials (A.R.S. §38‑431.03 noted during the motion). Recorded votes: Shontay Rothschild — Aye; Ben Owens — Aye; Carolyn Lopez — Aye; Patty Cutre — Aye. The board announced it would go into executive session at 7:56 p.m.

What this means: The meeting’s substantive discussion items (construction update, school presentations, public comment) did not include final board actions on those public‑comment requests during the Oct. 22 public meeting. The board proceeded with routine approvals and then moved to an executive session for the superintendent’s evaluation.