Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents urge district to limit in-class Chromebook use, citing student distraction and declining test scores
Summary
Public commenters told the board that pervasive Chromebook and screen use in middle-school classes contributes to distraction and may correlate with lower math and reading proficiency; one speaker, a longtime middle-school teacher, urged a return to computer labs or carts for focused instruction.
Two residents urged the board to reassess classroom technology use, arguing that expanded Chromebook access in middle grades is creating distractions and may be related to declining standardized test performance.
Meredith McGlinchey, a Springfield Township parent and middle-school teacher in a neighboring district, said the district’s test-score declines began before the COVID-19 pandemic and urged administrators to evaluate whether constant desktop Chromebook access is producing educational benefit commensurate with the expense. “Is there a better way of educating middle-school students?” McGlinchey asked, and suggested returning to classroom computer carts or dedicated labs so technology is used purposefully rather than serving as an on-desk distraction.
McGlinchey cited state proficiency trends she reviewed on public reporting sites and a district budget line for “purchased professional and technical services” she said deserved evaluation. A second commenter, Erin Finnegan, said she attended a recent middle-school information session about a travel program and observed that presentation was led by district employees — an observation raised elsewhere in the meeting — but added her concern that the cost of optional trips amplifies inequities.
Why it matters: Parents and some educators said unregulated device use can disrupt instructional time and that the district should consider delivery models that balance technology skill development with off-screen learning. Board members and administrators acknowledged the comments and noted technology policies, classroom management tools such as GoGuardian, and professional development remain in active use.
Ending note: The board did not take a formal action on Chromebook use at the meeting; public commenters asked that the administration consider pilot alternatives and report back.
