Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Metroparks Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident questions delay in MetroParks funding; commissioners say they'll consider requests after budget review

6403348 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Trumbull County resident pressed the Board of Commissioners about delays in disbursing funds to MetroParks. Commissioners said the request was not on the meeting agenda and will be considered along with other nonmandatory funding requests after they review updated budget figures.

A Trumbull County resident asked the Board of Commissioners why the county had not supplied the remaining funds to MetroParks, prompting an exchange in which commissioners said the board would place the parks’ funding request on a future agenda for formal consideration.

“MetroParks was just here last Tuesday at your workshop…So what's the hold up now?” asked Sean Shook, identified in the meeting as a Trumbull County resident.

Commissioner Malloy replied that the parks’ request had not been on the current meeting’s agenda and that the board had held a budget meeting the previous day to assess mandatory and nonmandatory expenditures. “We had to see where we were...there's mandatory services, and then there's nonmandatory services,” Malloy said, adding that updated figures from the Budget Commission showed roughly $1.1 million more than expected.

Malloy and other commissioners said the parks’ request would be considered alongside similar requests from the Board of Elections, the recorder’s office and other county departments. “It’ll be put on at our next meeting,” Malloy said in response to Shook’s question about timing.

Shook pressed commissioners on consistency, citing prior statements from a commissioner that the county bears some responsibility for boards it funds. Commissioners responded that the parks receive their own revenue in addition to county support and that formal action would occur when the item appears on an agenda.

No formal vote on MetroParks funding occurred at the meeting; commissioners instructed staff and the parks’ chair to present a request for the next meeting so the board could act after reviewing all outstanding budget requests.

Ending: The board concluded the exchange by agreeing to place the MetroParks funding request on a future agenda for a formal vote.