Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

BVNPT budget projection shows large fund balance but tighter operating savings for 2024–25


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

BVNPT budget projection shows large fund balance but tighter operating savings for 2024–25
The Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians heard a fiscal update Feb. 7 showing a healthy fund balance but lower-than-historical annual savings because limited-term positions ended and expenditure pressures increased.

Mark Ito, assistant executive officer, presented three documents: an expenditure projection, revenue projections and the board’s fund condition. For fiscal year 2024–25, staff project roughly $24,700,000 in revenue and about $19,100,000 in expenditures, leaving a fund balance that is growing in months in reserve but reducing annual operational savings compared with prior years.

Ito told the board the program previously saved about $1,500,000 annually; the board is now projecting much smaller year‑end savings — he cited a near-term projected reserve reduction (current-year savings down to about $35,000). The shrinkage reflected a two‑year limited‑term appropriation of roughly $500,000 that expired this year; to maintain operations, three positions were reclassified from the licensing unit into education positions at lower pay, which increased expenditures.

Staff identified near-term measures to ease the gap: beginning in March the vendor charge for online credit-card processing (a 2.3% fee) will be passed to applicants rather than absorbed by the board, which Ito estimated would save about $100,000 through the end of this fiscal year and approximately $300,000 in a full year. Staff are also exploring in‑year augmentation mechanisms (for expenses such as Attorney General or Office of Administrative Hearings costs) and plan a fee analysis to assess longer-term adjustments.

Why it matters: Although the fund has a growing months-in-reserve metric, Ito said the board is “structurally imbalanced” because receipts continue to outpace planned expenditures; staff recommended a fee audit to determine whether fee levels should change to keep ongoing operations balanced and sustainable.

Board questions: Members asked about boardwide relief for licensees in the Los Angeles area; Ito confirmed a departmentwide licensing-relief measure has been implemented in the Breeze system to defer renewal payments in affected areas for up to a year and allow voluntary payment.

Ending: Staff said they will return with more detail at a subsequent meeting and pursue the fee‑study and administrative steps to limit near‑term budget risk.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee