Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Records Transfers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glynn County Schools to adopt transfer-and-withdrawal policy to meet new state law on student records
Summary
District staff presented a proposed transfer-and-withdrawal policy to comply with House Bill 268, including tighter timelines for records, provisional enrollment rules and coordination with law enforcement; board to consider the policy and return for action in September.
District staff presented a new transfer-and-withdrawal policy that they said is being developed to comply with House Bill 268 and to bring district procedures into alignment with state requirements.
Ms. Hayward, a district staff member who led the policy discussion, said the law streamlines and consolidates existing record-sharing requirements and extends scrutiny of disciplinary records to elementary levels. She told the board the new policy requires districts to obtain certain records — including disciplinary histories, long-term suspensions or expulsions, pending tribunals and designated class A or B felonies — within a specified timeline. The policy would allow provisional enrollment (virtual instruction such as Google Classroom or Edgenuity) while the district awaits records.
“If we don't receive those records, we can do what's called a provisional enrollment, which means that we would enroll them virtually,” Ms. Hayward said. “...Essentially, yes, we would have to enroll them, but it would be a provisional enrollment until all of that information was collected.”
She told the board the law sets a stringent timeline for receiving records — staff said districts must receive records within five days in many cases and can provisionally enroll students up to 10 days while awaiting records. The law also includes a model memorandum of understanding (MOU) that districts will negotiate with local law enforcement to ensure sharing of criminal-activity information relevant to student safety; the state is expected to provide a model MOU by October.
Board members asked how the law would work for transfers from private schools or out-of-state districts. Ms. Hayward said the district still must request records from previous schools and noted that obtaining records from other states has been more challenging in the past. She said the state has created a privacy-officer position to monitor compliance with the law and that there are potential consequences for districts that do not meet requirements.
Staff asked the board to place the policy on the table for 30 days and consider approval at the September meeting.
Ending: Staff characterized the policy as a district implementation of state law; the board asked clarifying questions about timelines, provisional enrollment and the forthcoming model MOU and did not take a formal vote on the policy at the work session.
