Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes Budget Millage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts FY2025–26 millage and budget, several ordinances and routine contracts; concept plan deferred

5765703 · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Sept. 16 meeting the Oldsmar City Council adopted the FY2025–26 millage rate (4.05 mills) and the city budget, approved an ordinance governing city‑owned property and several interlocal and service amendments. The council did not approve a developer's conceptual plan for the city‑owned parcel and instead directed staff to continue talks.

The Oldsmar City Council on Sept. 16 approved several fiscal and administrative measures and took no final action on a developer’s revised conceptual plan for the city‑owned parcel adjacent to City Hall.

Key votes and outcomes - Resolution 2025‑24: Millage rate. The council set the FY2025–26 millage at 4.05 mills (proposed rate equal to prior year). Roll call: Vice Mayor Graber — Yes; Council Member Tadeuszewski — Yes; Council Member Swagger — Yes; Mayor Katie Gannon — Yes. The council adopted the resolution by recorded vote.

- Resolution 2025‑25: Budget appropriations for FY2025–26. The council adopted a total appropriations plan of $53,842,890, with the general fund set at $20,999,195. Roll call recorded the motion as adopted 4–0.

- Ordinance 2025‑02: City‑owned, controlled and leased property. The council completed second reading and adopted Ordinance 2025‑02 on the regulation of city‑owned, controlled and leased property. Roll call: adopted 4–0.

Other approvals (voice votes unless noted) - Resolution 2025‑26: Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) budget for FY2025–26 (CRA expenditures stated in the presentation as $3,190,015). Adopted by roll call 4–0.

- Amendment No. 1 to the Advanced Life Support (ALS) First Responder Agreement with the Pinellas County Emergency Medical Services Authority (increased FY2025–26 budget request to $709,573; an increase of 10.6% over FY2024–25). Council approved the amendment as presented.

- Amendment No. 1 to the interlocal agreement with Pinellas County Building Services concerning multimodal impact fees (updates to comply with Florida Statute 163.3180). Approved.

- FY2025–26 business assistance partnership agreement with the Upper Tampa Bay Chamber of Commerce. Approved; staff recommended waiving competitive sourcing based on unique local expertise.

- Waiver of competition and authorization for Cummins Sales & Service to complete an in‑frame engine overhaul and related identified critical repairs on a Pierce aerial apparatus (additional $3,768.18; total revised project price $28,692.90). Approved.

- Award to Austin Construction Group for repairs and renovations to the Distribution & Collection Building under cooperative terms; scope addresses hurricane damage and converts office area to air‑conditioned material storage. Approved.

- Consent docket: minutes, legal services, a work order for Dura Group Inc. (WRF backup generator design), and other routine items were approved by voice vote.

Non‑decisions and administrative items - Concept plan for city‑owned property (Stanbury Development Group): a motion to approve the revised concept plan was made and seconded but was withdrawn by the mover before a final vote; the council directed the city manager to continue negotiations and asked Stanbury for revised renderings and analyses.

- The council scheduled a work session on charitable donation requests for Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2025, at 6 p.m. and excused absences for two council members for this meeting.

Roll calls and formal tallies were recorded for the ordinance and the city’s millage and budget resolutions; routine procurement and contract approvals were approved by voice vote with no recorded roll‑call tallies in the transcript.

Meeting context: Councilors and staff characterized many approvals as routine and budget‑setting for the new fiscal year; the development discussion consumed the bulk of public comment and council time. The council asked for additional information and refined designs before any development agreement or final approvals are considered.