Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Library board delays decision on $20k strategic-plan proposal to review samples and alternatives

6406279 · October 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board discussed a proposal from Wills (a library consulting firm) to lead a strategic planning process for up to $20,500 but agreed to delay contracting for 30 days to review sample plans and alternative bids, and to examine plans used by nearby libraries.

The West Bend Community Memorial Library Board discussed proposals for a formal strategic planning process and agreed to postpone a contracting decision for approximately 30 days so board members could review sample plans and compare competing proposals.

Director Steve explained that Wills (a Wisconsin-based library consultant referenced in proposals) offered a full planning package that includes stakeholder interviews, community surveys, demographic research, staff workshops and a final strategic plan. The board heard that Wills had done strategic planning work in other Washington County libraries; one board member said Germantown’s plan is publicly available and recommended board members review it.

Several board members raised cost and scope questions. One competing proposal referenced in board materials had a starting figure in the $47,000–$57,000 range; Wills’ proposal was discussed at approximately $20,500. Board member Tim summarized the board’s interest in an actionable product: “When we’re done … we should live, eat, and breathe by it and that’s what should guide what we do as a board every single time we meet,” he said.

Other members said they would like to see sample deliverables and ask for written clarification of what is included before authorizing a contract. Steve said he had solicited multiple proposals and would send copies to board members; the board agreed to review Germantown and other example plans before the next meeting. With no objection, the board decided to delay the decision for approximately 30 days so members could study proposals and sample plans and return with questions at the November meeting.

The board requested that staff circulate the proposals and examples and that will’s scope, deliverables and cost be clarified in writing before a vote is taken.