Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Sign Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends updates to sign regulations, including new flag rules and alignment with taller building heights
Summary
The Planning Commission recommended that City Council approve a package of Land Development Code amendments to update sign regulations, add flag and flagpole standards, and align sign height limits with updated maximum building heights in commercial zones.
The Corvallis Planning Commission on April 2 recommended City Council approve an update to the city’s sign regulations that consolidates sign definitions, standardizes temporary sign rules, clarifies Willamette River Greenway procedures, and adjusts sign allowances to reflect changes in allowable building height.
Assistant planner Lydia Keller told commissioners the proposal (LDT‑2024‑05) moves sign definitions into the sign chapter, consolidates temporary sign rules, standardizes overhead clearance requirements, and adds specific provisions for building‑mounted and ground‑mounted flags, including a numerical limit on flagpoles per property.
Keller described key points in the draft amendment: allowing signs to be placed on more than one frontage of a property under an overall square‑foot allocation; increasing the permitted height for attached signs in the CMU zone to better align with a 105‑foot maximum building height in that zone; exempting certain blade/overhanging signs from sign permits if they meet size and clearance limits; and setting a base allowance of three flagpoles per property with one additional flagpole permitted for parcels extending beyond 200 feet from the primary street frontage.
Keller said the changes intend to produce clearer and more objective rules for staff and the public and to bring the sign chapter into alignment with amendments to building‑form and height standards that the city has adopted in recent years. Staff also recommended that signs on existing buildings in the Willamette River Greenway not require a separate Greenway permit when the building is separated from the Greenway by a public or private right‑of‑way; those signs would still need to comply with the city’s sign permit process.
Commission action: Commissioner Smith moved that the planning commission recommend City Council approve LDT‑2024‑05; Commissioner Adams seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Context: Staff said the city’s sign chapter had not been comprehensively updated since 2006, while multiple other code changes raised allowed building heights and altered urban form. The update seeks to ensure sign standards scale appropriately with current form‑based allowances and to codify content‑neutral flag/flagpole rules.
Next steps: The commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for a separately noticed public hearing and final decision.
