Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pharmacy Scope Rule To Statute topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee unanimously forwards bill moving Board of Pharmacy rules into statute; pharmacists, a former board member testify in support
Summary
House Bill 200, which moves remaining Board of Pharmacy rules into statute and keeps existing practice authority unchanged, passed the Senate Health and Welfare Committee after testimony from a former public member of the Board of Pharmacy and a pharmacy director who described expanded pharmacist practice in Idaho.
Representative Jordan Redmond presented House Bill 200 and said it completes a multi-year effort to move the Board of Pharmacy’s rules into statute, noting the measure makes no substantive policy changes, does not expand practice authority, and is intended to provide stability for businesses and patients.
“Idaho is leading the way for other states in recognizing pharmacists as the medical professionals that we are trained to be,” Marcus Hurst, pharmacy director for Rollins Pharmacy and a licensed pharmacist, told the committee in remote testimony. Hurst described pharmacist training requirements, point-of-care testing, independent prescribing, extending prescriptions when providers are unavailable, and said Idaho Medicaid recognizes pharmacists as practitioners eligible to bill for medical services.
Ed Sperry, a former public member of the Board of Pharmacy who said he served 10 years, testified in support and said the board’s role is to protect the public and that the bill “provides great protection for the public by creating some stability in the business environment.”
Redmond told the committee that stakeholders asked about the phrasing “pharmacists may independently prescribe” and that the draft preserves existing language from rule 350 as previously adopted and repeatedly approved by the legislature over several rule cycles.
Senator Burkey moved and Senator Harris seconded that House Bill 200 be sent to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation. The committee approved the motion by voice vote with no recorded opposition.
The bill was presented as a technical/statutory migration of existing Board of Pharmacy rules into statute to increase predictability for practitioners and patients without changing scope of practice.
