Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Budget Revenue Projections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

JFAC fails to set FY2026 revenue projection after divided votes; decision postponed

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After substitute and original motions, the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee did not secure the required bicameral majorities to adopt a FY2026 general fund revenue number and will revisit the matter later.

The Idaho Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee did not adopt a general fund revenue projection for fiscal year 2026 after a series of competing motions produced split votes in the Senate and House delegations.

An initial motion to adopt the Economic Outlook and Revenue Assessment Committee's recommended FY2026 projection of $6,400,000,000 was offered by Representative Petsky. Senator Woodward offered a substitute motion setting the FY2026 revenue projection at $6,330,000,000; the substitute was the first to be recorded and failed on a combined tally of 9 ayes to 11 nays (Senate: 8 ayes / 2 nays; House: 1 aye / 9 nays). The committee then voted on the original motion (the higher $6.4 billion figure); the chair announced a final roll tally that left the committee without a majority from both chambers and the original motion also failed. Because the committee requires a majority from both the Senate and House delegations to send numbers forward, members postponed a final FY2026 revenue decision for a later time.

Committee members debated the merits of three different forecasts during the discussion. Supporters of the higher economic-outlook number argued the committee's revenue-assessment panel crafted a reasonable conservative baseline; supporters of the compromise number argued for a more cautious estimate. Several members โ€” including Representative Tanner, Senator Galloway and Senator Ward Engleking โ€” described the substitute motion as a compromise between viewpoints.

With no bicameral majority on either the substitute or original motion, the committee did not set a FY2026 revenue baseline and will return to the question in a future meeting. Members proceeded to other statewide decisions during the session.