Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Bank Extension topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to extend Idaho land-bank holding period amid debate over state purchases
Summary
The committee considered House Bill 129, which would extend the allowable holding period for proceeds in the state land bank from five years to ten years, and voted to send the bill to the fourteenth order for possible amendment.
Get email alerts on the Land Bank Extension topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The committee considered House Bill 129, which would extend the allowable holding period for proceeds in the state land bank from five years to ten years, and voted to send the bill to the fourteenth order for possible amendment.
Sponsor testimony: Representative John Vander Ryder (sponsor) told the committee HB 129 would give the State Land Board and the Idaho Department of Lands more time to identify and acquire suitable endowment land after the sale of state property. "That money is placed in the land bank from sale of state property," he said, and the bill would extend the period the land board can hold those proceeds before they must be transferred to the permanent endowment fund.
Supporters emphasized public-access and conservation goals. Heather Eastman, executive director of Idaho Business for the Outdoors, said: "We support the passage of House Bill 129, a bill that would extend the time frame for the land board to use funds generated from the sale of public lands from the current 5 year period to 10." She said without an extension, an estimated $36.1 million would transfer out of the land bank in the next two years and be unavailable for land purchases. Nick Fasiano, executive director of the Idaho Wildlife Federation, and other recreation and timber-industry witnesses urged the committee to preserve flexibility for the Land Board to acquire endowment lands and noted the Land Board may transfer funds to the permanent endowment anytime it chooses.
Opponents warned of impacts to private property owners and local tax bases. Russ Hendricks, representing the Idaho Farm Bureau Federation, said the Land Board has increased holdings in recent years and that purchases reduce private ownership and county tax rolls. "Government already owns more than 70% of our entire state," Hendricks said, and he asked the Legislature to avoid further net loss of private property; he recommended the bill be held or amended to be less aggressive toward private ownership.
Other testimony described acquisition and transparency processes. Jonathan Oppenheimer of Idaho Conservation League said the Land Board's process is public and documented and that land assets can smooth portfolio volatility. Committee members asked technical questions about balances and timing: Representative Vander Ryder and witnesses estimated roughly $85 million currently in the land bank, with several million scheduled to transfer out over the next one to two years; witnesses characterized those figures as approximate.
Final committee action: Senator Guthrie moved to send HB 129 to the fourteenth order for possible amendment; Senator Hart seconded. The committee recorded a roll call in which seven senators voted aye and two voted no (Senator Harris and Senator Cook). The motion carried and HB 129 was advanced for amendment. No amendment text was adopted in committee.
The debate in committee highlighted a policy trade-off: supporters said the extension preserves state flexibility to acquire endowment lands that provide public access and long-term returns; opponents said more state purchases reduce privately held land and shrink county tax rolls. The committee's referral to the fourteenth order allows sponsors and opponents to propose amendments for the full Senate consideration.
