Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

State Affairs committee advances law to standardize agency agreements reporting; introduces campaign-fee and energy ratepayer measures

2989503 · March 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Idaho House State Affairs Committee on Monday advanced legislation to require state agencies to report agreements and memoranda of understanding to the State Comptroller under a uniform statutory standard and introduced several draft measures affecting campaign filing fees, campaign merchandise reporting, and large power users.

The Idaho House State Affairs Committee on Monday advanced legislation to require state agencies to report agreements and memoranda of understanding to the State Comptroller under a uniform statutory standard and introduced several draft measures affecting campaign filing fees, campaign merchandise reporting, and large power users.

House Bill 358, presented by Rep. Heather Scott (R.-District 2), received a motion to send it to the House floor with a due-pass recommendation and the motion carried by voice vote. Scott told the committee the bill converts a comptroller policy into law because the policy alone does not compel agencies to post agreements online. The bill directs agencies to submit agreements through the State Comptroller’s designated reporting portal and standardizes required data fields, including the document title, execution date, parties, and a summary of purpose. It also establishes an annual review of reporting practices. Scott said the measure stops short of requiring a full digital document portal at this time but could be expanded once reporting is routine.

Also before the committee were three RS (request statutes) introduced for consideration:

- RS32292C1 (Rep. Stephanie Mickelson, R.-Dist. 32) proposes raising candidate filing fees. Mickelson described an increase in several fee amounts — for example, U.S. Senate from $500 to $1,000, U.S. House from $300 to $500, statewide constitutional offices from $200 to $1,000, state legislator filing to $250, supreme court justice to $1,000, district judges to $250 and countywide offices to $100 — and said signature requirements would remain unchanged. She said the intent is to ensure candidates filing for office are “serious in that endeavor” and reduce frivolous filings. The committee voted to introduce the RS by motion.

- RS32571 (Rep. Joe Alfieri, R.-Dist. 4) would allow campaigns to report sales of campaign merchandise as bulk transactions rather than itemizing each sale, provided each individual sale is at or below a $200 transaction limit. Alfieri said the change is intended to permit candidates to sell shirts, hats and similar items and report them as aggregate transactions to the Secretary of State rather than reporting each sale. Committee members asked whether sales tax would still apply; Alfieri said the language exempts such transactions from reporting under “Chapter 36 Title 63” (as read in the draft) and that sales tax collection questions would depend on the point in the chain when tax is charged. Committee members probed whether resale scenarios, donated goods, or higher-value items are covered and whether multiple small transactions to different purchasers would trigger reporting; Alfieri responded that multiple separate transactions would be reportable.

- RS32620 (Rep. Dan Garner, R.-Dist. 28) was introduced as a ratepayer-protection concept. Garner described it as a bill that would require an incoming large electricity user that would consume at least 10 megawatts to pay for the infrastructure or generation necessary to serve that new load, and prohibit passing those costs onto utility ratepayers. The committee introduced the RS.

The committee approved several procedural items by voice vote, including approval of the minutes for March 6 and unanimous-consent reordering of the agenda to place RS32620 at the end for consideration. The committee also considered House Resolution 11 (Rep. Barbara Ehart, R.-Dist. 33), a ceremonial resolution recognizing the historical role of prayer in American public life; Rep. Ehart referenced historical material and the U.S. Supreme Court decision March v. Chambers in her remarks. The committee moved HR 11 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation by voice vote.

Votes at a glance

- Approval of minutes for Monday, March 6 — voice vote; motion carried. - Introduce RS32292C1 (filing-fee increases) — motion to introduce carried by voice vote. - Introduce RS32571 (campaign merchandise reporting, $200 aggregate threshold) — motion to introduce carried by voice vote. - House Bill 358 (statutory standard for agency agreement reporting) — motion to send to the floor with a due-pass recommendation carried by voice vote. - House Resolution 11 (recognition of prayer’s historic role) — motion to send to the floor with a due-pass recommendation carried by voice vote. - Introduce RS32620 (ratepayer protection for large power users, 10 MW threshold) — motion to introduce carried by voice vote.

Discussion vs. formal action

Committee members engaged in substantive discussion on three items: candidate filing fees (questions about specific fee amounts and signature requirements); the mechanics and tax implications of allowing campaigns to aggregate merchandise sales reporting; and who would bear infrastructure costs for large electricity users. Formal committee actions were introductory votes for the RS items and affirmative procedural votes to advance HB 358 and HR 11 to the House floor with due-pass recommendations. All formal motions reported in the transcript were carried by voice vote; no roll-call tallies were recorded in the transcript.

Why it matters

HB 358 would change reporting from a comptroller policy to a statutory requirement, creating a uniform dataset for agreements, MOUs and similar instruments across state agencies. If enacted, it would increase legislative and public visibility into interagency and external arrangements. The campaign-related RS and the energy RS would affect how candidates raise and report small-dollar in-kind transactions and who ultimately pays for new infrastructure associated with large power users — issues that touch campaign finance transparency and utility ratepayer protections.

What’s next

The committee forwarded HB 358 and HR 11 to the full House under due-pass recommendations. The RS items were introduced for committee consideration and will return for future hearings and potential amendment. No roll-call votes or recorded opposition were shown in the transcript.