Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rulemaking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Affairs committee introduces multiple rulemaking and administrative resolutions
Summary
The committee introduced a series of proposed statutory revisions and file-stock resolutions on subjects ranging from electrical-contractor supervision to sunset rules and changes to rule-review timing; several were introduced with little debate and one received an amendment to its effective dates.
The House State Affairs Committee introduced several legislative files and requests (RS) covering administrative rulemaking, licensing supervision and a proposal to alter birth-certificate amendment language.
Representative Kyle Harris presented RS 32,337, which would change statutory supervision requirements for electrical contractors to align with proposed administrative rules and to ease supervision constraints that affect apprentice-to-journeyman ratios on residential jobs. Representative Harris said the intention is to "help houses get built faster" while maintaining oversight.
Representative Vito Barbieri presented several related RS files focused on reinvesting legislative control over administrative rules: RS 32,100 would reintroduce expirations or sunsets for administrative rules; RS 32,098 would constrain agency directors' ability to promulgate rules after a transition period; and RS 32,099 would create a process for committees to review and, if necessary, reject final rules. During consideration of RS 32,099 the committee amended dates in the draft—striking July 1 and inserting June 30 on two lines—and approved the motion to introduce the RS with those changes.
Representative Barbieri also presented RS 32,094, a narrower proposal originated on behalf of a constituent to change a designation on birth certificates; he said fuller discussion would occur at a hearing.
A short procedural RS (listed in the transcript as RS 3,294) was also introduced with limited discussion.
Most of these items were introduced by voice vote with little floor debate recorded in the transcript. Where sponsors requested further hearings, committee members generally signaled support for fuller vetting in subsequent proceedings.
