Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Iep topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tennessee House approves IEP-notice bill after debate over sending psychological evaluations to parents
Summary
Lawmakers approved a bill codifying state board rules requiring that parents receive draft individualized education plans and other evaluation documents before meetings; opponents warned that sending psychological evaluations home before a meeting can traumatize parents and recommended additional explanation by psychologists.
The Tennessee House on Thursday passed House Bill 8 61, which codifies existing State Board of Education rules requiring local education agencies to give parents at least 10 days’ notice before an individualized education plan (IEP) meeting, and to provide a copy of the draft IEP at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting.
The legislation also requires that copies of all evaluations and assessments used for the student’s IEP be provided to the parent or guardian. Representative Jason McCallman, the sponsor, said the bill "is simply to equip our parents" so they go into IEP meetings with questions and are better able to participate.
Representative Leslie Johnson, who raised objections during floor debate, said much of the bill echoes federal requirements but singled out the provision that would send psychological evaluations to parents before a meeting. "Those initial evaluations can be traumatizing for parents," Johnson said, arguing that psychological reports are complex and often require in-person explanation by a school psychologist.
McCallman responded that the sponsor wanted to codify protections for parental access rather than rely solely on federal law. He said parents should be given the opportunity to review documents and prepare questions, and he encouraged local agencies to include explanatory cover letters or summaries when they send the documents.
Representative Kevin Slater noted there is nothing in the bill that prevents an LEA or school psychologist from attaching a cover letter or a brief narrative to help parents interpret results, and he encouraged districts to provide that context.
House members voted to adopt the committee amendment and then passed the bill. The clerk reported the tally as "Ayes 92" with other attendance notations recorded; the House record shows the bill received the constitutional majority needed to pass.
The bill’s sponsor said the law is intended to give parents time to formulate questions and participate more fully in the IEP process. Opponents urged caution when distributing sensitive psychological material without accompaniment by a professional who can explain testing and conclusions.
