Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assisted Living Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel advances bill to update assisted-living rules, streamline licensing and redirect fines to remediation
Summary
The Idaho Senate Health and Welfare Committee voted to send Senate Bill 1102, the "Idaho Residential Care or Assisted Living Act," to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation after testimony from the bill sponsor and provider representatives.
Get email alerts on the Assisted Living Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boise — The Idaho Senate Health and Welfare Committee voted to send Senate Bill 1102, the "Idaho Residential Care or Assisted Living Act," to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation after testimony from the bill sponsor and representatives of assisted-living providers.
Senator Camille Blaylock, sponsor of SB 1102, told the committee the bill "seeks to address the over regulation of residential care and assisted living communities in Idaho" and aims to make it easier to open and operate facilities while fostering a partnership with the Department of Health and Welfare.
The bill’s provisions described in committee testimony include: simplifying licensing for new and existing providers; allowing a licensed administrator to oversee up to three facilities under a single license; permitting administrators to delegate day-to-day operational duties to building managers; scheduling routine licensing surveys with 30 days’ notice (while preserving the department’s ability to enter unannounced when there is a complaint); providing an optional template for plan-of-corrections when deficiencies are cited; and changing how monetary penalties are handled so amounts assessed are used to correct the cited problem rather than being retained by the department. Testimony said about $300,000 currently held in penalty funds would be moved into a grant fund for assisted-living communities to apply for remedial work.
Robert VanderMeer, executive director of the Idaho Health Care Association, told the committee the department and providers "are our partners" and supported the bill’s changes. VanderMeer reviewed multiple code changes during his remarks, noting the bill moves some language from IDAPA rule into statute and narrows overly broad definitions of "inadequate care" so that only conduct causing or likely to cause "immediate jeopardy" would rise to that level of citation.
Angela Hillis, a registered nurse and licensed administrator who operates assisted-living communities, said many current statutory and rule requirements are "very antiquated clinically," and that some procedures now common in outpatient settings (for example, placement of gastrostomy tubes or suprapubic catheters as same-day procedures) prevent assisted-living communities from accepting residents under the existing rule framework. Hillis said the bill would make it easier clinically for providers to care for residents whose medical needs have evolved.
Other discussion in committee touched on restraints and positioning devices, discharge language for residents with progressive behaviors tied to dementia or Alzheimer's, complaint listings on the department website, and delegation of nursing assessments. VanderMeer and Blaylock said the bill clarifies that properly documented positioning devices are not automatically treated as restraints, that certain routine reassessments within a 30-day window will not require a complete re-assessment, and that the bill would allow, where appropriate, a licensed nurse to delegate some assessments if authorized.
Senators on both sides of the table praised the sponsor and provider witnesses. Senator Sandra Harris, who moved the motion to advance the bill, said the change requiring that penalty money be used to fix problems "is a much needed change, and it makes perfect sense." Senator Wintrow seconded the motion.
The committee recorded the motion to send SB 1102 to the full Senate with a do-pass recommendation. The motion carried by voice vote; members present answered "aye." The committee did not conduct a roll-call vote in the transcript portion provided.
The bill’s sponsor and witnesses offered to walk through the draft statute page by page in follow-up hearings and to identify exactly which IDAPA rule sections are incorporated into the statute.
