Citizen Portal

Idaho proposal would replace supervision with collaborative agreements for prescribing psychologists

Senate Health & Welfare February 10, 2025 · February 10, 2025

Summary

Sen. Mark Harris introduced RS32220 to reduce supervision barriers for prescribing psychologists by moving to collaborative agreements and removing a permanent advisory panel; committee voted to send the request to print by voice vote.

Senator Mark Harris introduced RS32220 to the Idaho Senate Health and Welfare Committee, saying the measure "basically improves and streamlines practice of psychology in the state of Idaho." The legislation would replace the current supervision model for provisional prescribing psychologists with a collaborative agreement model and would eliminate a permanent advisory panel.

Harris told the committee that the current rule requiring a supervisor or supervision agreement with only an Idaho or adjoining-state physician has become cumbersome. "As a result, Idaho has only 8 prescribing psychologists since the bill to allow prescribing psychologists went into effect 8 years ago," he said, and the bill is intended to reduce barriers while maintaining patient safety.

Under the proposal, provisional prescribing psychologists would enter collaborative agreements with prescribers rather than meet the existing supervision criteria. Harris said the collaborative model is intended to be easier for both the provisional prescriber and the collaborating prescriber while preserving safeguards for patients.

After Harris' introduction, Senator Shippey moved to send RS32220 to print and Senator Buerke seconded. The committee approved the motion by voice vote; no roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source