Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JFAC approves technical corrections to maintenance bills; caps constitutional officers' FTP at 431.9
Summary
The Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee approved several technical language fixes to maintenance bills by unanimous consent and voted to cap full‑time equivalent positions for constitutional officers at 431.9, advancing the maintenance package toward the floor.
The Joint Finance‑Appropriations Committee on Feb. 6 approved multiple technical corrections to maintenance‑bill language by unanimous consent and separately voted to cap full‑time equivalent (FTP) positions for constitutional officers at 431.9.
Chairwoman Horman opened the meeting saying the first items were “technical corrections to the maintenance bills which this committee has already approved.” Keith Bybee, Division Manager for Budget Policy Analysis with Legislative Services, described four edits identified after the committee’s January decisions: two in the public‑schools budget (including an update to program‑transfer language to reflect the Idaho Digital Learning Academy’s new division), one in Health and Human Services related to a Millennium Income Fund appropriation reference, and a typographical correction to the FTP cap for constitutional officers.
The committee accepted the public‑schools and Health and Human Services language changes by unanimous consent after brief staff explanations from Jared Tetreault, Deputy Manager, Budget Division, and Alex Williamson, budget and policy analyst. The unanimous‑consent motions were made to “accept the language shown on the screen,” and no members objected.
The correction to the constitutional officers’ FTP cap required a formal recorded motion because it affected a numeric cap. Keith Bybee read the corrected motion on the record: “I move to cap full time equivalent positions for the constitutional officers at 431.9.” The motion was seconded and approved on a roll call. The clerk reported the Senate and House votes and the chair announced: “The majority having voted in the affirmative, the motion has passed and without objection will carry a due pass recommendation.”
Why it matters: technical edits and numeric corrections are routine but necessary to align statutory language and appropriation tables with the committee’s intent. The FTP cap change corrects a typographical error that would otherwise leave an incorrect personnel cap in the adopted maintenance bill.
What happens next: The accepted language and the FTP cap will be incorporated into the maintenance‑bill packages the committee sends to the floor.
Votes at a glance - Cap FTP for constitutional officers at 431.9 — Outcome: passed; tally reported as a unanimous vote for that motion by the Senate and House on the record and carried a due‑pass recommendation.
(Reporting based on staff presentations and roll‑call announcements in the committee meeting.)
