Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bioethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Idaho committee rejects resolution reaffirming Nuremberg Code as foundation for research ethics
Summary
The Idaho Senate Health & Welfare Committee voted 3–6 to reject Senate Concurrent Resolution 104, a nonbinding measure by Sen. Tammy Nichols that would have reaffirmed the Nuremberg Code and encouraged institutions to follow related international and U.S. ethical declarations.
Sen. Tammy Nichols introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 104, saying the measure "reaffirms Idaho's commitment to ethical medical and scientific research by recognizing the Nuremberg Code as the foundation for protecting human rights." The resolution would have encouraged Idaho medical, academic and research institutions to follow the Nuremberg Code and related standards, and Nichols described it as advisory and without fiscal impact.
"By passing SCR 104, we send a clear message that Idaho stands for ethical responsibility in science and medicine," Nichols said at the hearing. She cited historical abuses — including Nazi medical experiments, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the Willowbrook hepatitis research and the Guatemala syphilis experiments — as reasons to maintain strong safeguards for informed consent, transparency and independent oversight.
Committee members pressed Nichols on specifics. Sen. Jane Blaylock asked what state laws or policies the resolution would prompt the Legislature to change; Nichols responded the language was primarily preventive and she had no specific statutory edits in mind. Sen. Melissa Wintrow questioned why the resolution would reference international declarations rather than U.S. or Idaho-origin standards; Nichols replied that the Nuremberg Code and later documents have had broad U.S. input and that the resolution only recognizes complementary contributions, not adopts foreign law.
Other members raised objections about citing international organizations. Sen. Jon Shippey asked by what standard the Nuremberg Code should be judged "right," and Sen. Shippey and others said they were uneasy with language that referenced UNESCO or United Nations documents. Sen. Snyder Phil and others argued that additional protective statements are worthwhile to prevent future abuses.
A motion to send SCR 104 to the Senate floor with a "do pass" recommendation was made and seconded. The committee conducted a roll-call and the motion failed by a 3–6 vote. The committee announced the tally as three ayes and six nays; named votes recorded on the transcript include Sen. Pierke voting aye and Sen. Shippey, Sen. Blaylock and Chair Van Orden recorded as voting no.
