Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Device Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances draft ‘distraction-free learning’ bill to print after discussion
Summary
Committee considered RS 32029, a draft requiring districts to assess mobile device impact and adopt local policies; the committee voted to print the RS following questions about implementation and student exemptions.
Senators reviewed RS 32029, a proposed bill that would require Idaho school districts to assess the impact of mobile electronic devices on students and develop a policy that “promotes distraction-free learning.” The draft does not mandate a single statewide approach but would require districts to adopt a policy by the end of the year.
Senator Craig Berndt, one of the bill’s sponsors, said the approach preserves local control. “This legislation … doesn't dictate what a policy looks like, but grants school districts local control to tailor policies to their specific needs and circumstances,” he told the committee.
Committee members asked for clarifications about the scope and timeline. Senator Nichols asked whether districts have a timeframe; Berndt replied the policy must be adopted “by the end of the year.” Senator Semeroth asked whether the definition of “electronic communications device” includes tablets; Berndt confirmed it does. Semeroth also noted a statutory exemption in the draft for students with individualized education programs and asked whether that would allow continued use of assistive technology; Berndt confirmed the exemption is intended to allow assistive-device use.
After questions, a committee member moved to send RS 32029 to print. The motion was moved and seconded and approved by voice vote.
The committee’s action was procedural: the motion sent the RS to print so the bill language can be published for further review and potential introduction. No final policy was adopted at the hearing; the printed RS remains a draft that would proceed through standard legislative steps if introduced.
Items discussed during the RS presentation included the West Ada School District’s local policy as an example of variation between districts and an explicit timeline requiring district policies by the end of the year.
