Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Agency Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to align Health and Welfare bureau chiefs with division standards
Summary
Senators voted to send Senate Bill 52 to the floor after sponsor Senator Lenny said the measure would make bureau chiefs subject to appointment and removal by the department director with board concurrence, aiming to increase accountability for large bureaus.
Senators advanced Senate Bill 52 to the floor after a presentation from its sponsor explaining the measure would align bureau chief staffing with division-level appointment standards at the Department of Health and Welfare.
"We have several bureaus that oversee millions of dollars. They oversee hundreds of employees," Senator Lenny told the committee. He said the bill would make bureau chiefs "appointed and serve at the pleasure of the director with the concurrence of the board," similar to current practice for division heads.
As examples, Senator Lenny said the child support bureau has 101 full-time employees and that the department's benefit field operations bureau has about 418 FTEs; he contrasted those figures with a 249-FTE total he attributed to the Department of Agriculture. He said the change is intended to improve accountability for taxpayer dollars and make it administratively easier to hire and remove bureau chiefs.
Department staff said the change aligns with current practice for division administrators. "The board meets quarterly and currently our division administrators ... can be hired prior to the board concurring their appointment. So they can serve until the quarterly board meeting," Adam Jones of the Department of Health and Welfare told the committee.
Senator Blaylock moved to send Senate Bill 52 to the floor with a "do pass" recommendation; Senator Wintrow seconded the motion. The committee advanced the bill on a voice vote recorded as "Aye." No roll-call tally was recorded in the hearing transcript.
Committee members asked follow-up questions about how often the governing board meets and about the scope of bureaus; the department's staff response indicated the change formalizes an appointment process similar to existing practices for divisions rather than creating a new mechanism.
